What does Merton's strain theory say about sport deviancy?

Enhance your understanding of deviance in sports with our comprehensive quiz. Test your knowledge with multiple choice questions and detailed explanations. Prepare effectively for your exam!

Multiple Choice

What does Merton's strain theory say about sport deviancy?

Explanation:
Strain theory explains deviance as a response to social pressure when the goals of a culture are highly valued but the legitimate ways to achieve them are blocked or hard to reach. In sport, the culture prizes winning, fame, and the rewards that come with success, and there are legitimate routes to that success—training, fair competition, access to resources, opportunity, and support. When those legitimate paths feel blocked—perhaps due to limited opportunities, unequal access, or systemic barriers—some athletes may feel pressure to find alternative, illegitimate means to reach the same valued goals. Doping, cheating, or other rule-breaking become ways to achieve success when the sanctioned routes are inaccessible or unobtainable. So, the best answer captures this link between blocked legitimate opportunities and turning to illegitimate means to pursue valued outcomes. The other statements don’t fit because they frame deviance as solely about personal flaw, guaranteed punishment, or media influence, rather than as a response to structural pressure within sport.

Strain theory explains deviance as a response to social pressure when the goals of a culture are highly valued but the legitimate ways to achieve them are blocked or hard to reach. In sport, the culture prizes winning, fame, and the rewards that come with success, and there are legitimate routes to that success—training, fair competition, access to resources, opportunity, and support. When those legitimate paths feel blocked—perhaps due to limited opportunities, unequal access, or systemic barriers—some athletes may feel pressure to find alternative, illegitimate means to reach the same valued goals. Doping, cheating, or other rule-breaking become ways to achieve success when the sanctioned routes are inaccessible or unobtainable.

So, the best answer captures this link between blocked legitimate opportunities and turning to illegitimate means to pursue valued outcomes. The other statements don’t fit because they frame deviance as solely about personal flaw, guaranteed punishment, or media influence, rather than as a response to structural pressure within sport.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy